Losing a civil lawsuit leaves many people feeling frustrated and confused. Trial courts do not always reach the correct result, which is why appeals exist. However, an appellate court cannot simply retry a case from scratch or review every mistake that happened in the courtroom.
We expect appellate courts to overturn trial court rulings when those rulings are in error. Unfortunately, there are sometimes reasons why they may reject an otherwise solid appeal.
One of those reasons may be that the attorney seeking to appeal failed to document and challenge the potentially mistaken ruling during trial – which is done by making an objection.
Without an objection, the official trial transcript remains silent on the mistake. Appellate courts usually treat unobjected errors as waived, with limited exceptions.
A trial attorney has a legal duty to protect their client’s rights – both in the moment and for future review. If they fail to raise timely objections on the record, their client may lose the right to appeal those issues entirely.
Under certain circumstances, a failure to preserve the record might constitute legal malpractice.
The importance of timely objections during trial
Trials involve strict procedural rules governing evidence, testimony and jury instructions. These rules are meant to keep the process fair and promote a just outcome.
However, trial judges do occasionally make mistakes. They may admit improper evidence or give flawed instructions to the jury, for example.
When an adverse event like that occurs in the courtroom, the attorney must immediately state an objection on the record and explain the legal grounds for that objection.
This process gives the trial judge a fair chance to correct the error immediately. Equally important, the objection creates a clear written record for the appellate court.
How might this play out in a real case?
Consider this common scenario involving a breach of contract dispute:
- A business owner sues a former partner for financial losses.
- At trial, the ex-partner’s lawyer attempts to introduce hearsay testimony about a critical document.
- The business owner’s attorney knows the evidence is inadmissible under Florida evidentiary rules but, for whatever reason, fails to object, allowing the jury to hear the damaging hearsay.
- The jury relies on that evidence and returns a verdict against the business owner.
- The business owner tries to appeal, but the appellate court upholds the verdict because the business owner’s lawyer never objected during trial and thereby waived the issue (and there was no exception).
In a situation like this, the failure to object effectively shuts the door on an appeal that could otherwise have resulted in a reversal.
Is failing to object always legal malpractice?
Not necessarily. It depends on the circumstances and, in part, upon how strong your appellate argument would have been.
Florida lawyers owe their clients a duty of competence and diligence under the law. Rule 4-1.1 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar requires an attorney to provide competent representation. The judicial comments to this rule clarify that thoroughness and preparation require the use of methods and procedures meeting the standards of competent practitioners.
Additionally, Rule 4-1.3 mandates that a lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness when representing a client.
While a violation of ethical rules alone does not automatically create a civil claim, these rules help establish the legal standard of care.
Under Florida law, a legal malpractice claim requires proving four elements: the attorney owed a duty of care to a client, they breached that duty, the breach directly caused the client harm, and the client suffered financial damages.
Proving causation in an appellate context requires demonstrating a “case within a case.” A client must prove that the trial judge made a reversible error, that a proper objection would have preserved the issue, and that the appellate court would have reversed the judgment if the attorney had preserved the record.
Get more information
If you suspect your attorney may have made trial errors like this one, it may be helpful to have an experienced attorney review the trial record and any appeal filings for you. One with experience handling legal malpractice cases can do that effectively.