There are a number of email mistakes attorneys in Florida may make. While some of these may be small, others can rise to the level of negligence and may constitute legal malpractice in some cases.
When Florida residents or companies hire a law firm, they may have thousands or millions of dollars at stake on the legal advice that they receive. In one case, a firm is facing claims of legal malpractice from a company that accuses it of providing erroneous and inaccurate legal services in reference to the company's plans to start and operate a cryptocurrency management fund. Digital Capital Management says that its fund is intended to invest in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and ethereum as well as a broader group of blockchain systems, which use secure technology to track transactions.
The environmental and economic potential of solar power is enticing to many people in Florida and across the country. However, some unscrupulous companies may launch fraudulent solar projects to garner green investment funds while company founders allegedly run off with the proceeds. In one case, investors are suing major law firms for legal malpractice in the aftermath of what authorities described as a Ponzi-style scheme operating as a solar panel manufacturing company.
A major law firm with Florida clients is facing a lawsuit for legal malpractice after one of its lawyers allegedly misappropriated funds from a client's company. The lawsuit against Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld claims that the firm managed finances for a domain name company, Future Media Architects (FMA). According to the suit, FMA's CEO was suffering from mental health issues and substance abuse problems at the time, leaving him to assign some of his own management duties to the law firm.
When people in Florida face a legal dispute or a criminal case, they often rely on their attorneys to provide them with accurate representation that can protect their rights. However, conflicts of interest, negligence and other issues of attorney misconduct can lead to people facing severe repercussions in court. One attorney is suing another major firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, for alleged legal malpractice after one case led to negative results. The former attorney says that the firm represented a client in a matter where one of the partners had already served as an arbitrator.
Some people in Florida may have heard that Donald Trump's former campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, was involved in a property dispute with his neighbors over an easement. In 2017, Lewandowski filed a $5 million lawsuit against them saying they would not allow him access to an easement that was the only way he could get to his property on the waterfront. He said they harassed workers he had hired to build a garage.
Attorneys are generally not allowed to practice law in any state or part of a state where they are not licensed to do so. Furthermore, an attorney who is not allowed to practice law in Florida or any other state cannot make it seem as if he or she is able to do so. It is also unlawful for individuals to help other attorneys establish themselves in areas where they are not allowed to practice law.
Legal malpractice lawsuits in Florida and around the country are often initiated by individuals who lost lawsuits they felt they should have won. Rapper and film star Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson filed such a lawsuit after a jury ordered him to pay $7 million to the girlfriend of his hip-hop rival Rick Ross. The woman alleged that Jackson caused her injury, loss or damage by leaking a sex tape on the internet. The verdict prompted Jackson to file for bankruptcy.
A Florida-based law firm is representing the receiver of the Jay Peak ski resort in Vermont who says the ex-attorneys of the former owner and associates failed to act in order to protect many investors who were allegedly victims of fraud. The lawsuit was filed in Florida because the former owner resides there.
Attorneys in Florida and around the country may face legal malpractice lawsuits when their negligent actions cause their clients harm. A Philadelphia lawyer was threatened with such a lawsuit when he demanded $320,000 in compensation for services already provided from a client who had decided that his interests would be best served by a different law firm. During the ensuing negotiations, the attorney agreed to accept $160,000.